4款可换镜头DC感光度PK NEX5/E-PL1/NX10/GF1pk

毫无对比价值啦，硬件都不是一个级别的。NEX是APS-C感光元件，高感如果拼不过3就实在说不过去了

1回复2010-06-07 11:48:47发表

sony的照片锐度太差了，这个一眼就看出来了

1回复2010-06-04 22:06:06发表

而且，“davidhoy”在23楼所引用的话完全反对你自己观点，翻译一下给你看：然而，两台相机在试图拍出明亮照片的时候都倾向于过度曝光，这对于大动态范围来说几乎没什么好处（并且你无法在全自动模式下应用曝光补偿，因此你根本无法阻止过度曝光）至于您的英语水平，自己去看看吧...

0回复2010-06-09 14:08:50发表

Dpreview在算分时是这样分配权重的：画质占35%，机身-屏幕-取景器/握持-操控/功能各占13%，其他方面11.5%，速度占9.5%，价格占5%。 虽然NEX画质较佳，但其他方面得分较低，因此总分较低。

0回复 2010-06-09 13:45:18发表

you also will konw : All scores are relative to the other cameras in the same category// For compacts the scores are also broadly comparable across categories// The lengths of the bars represent the weighted average of a range of measurements and scores// The final score is calculated using a weighted average of the main category scores// A camera's score represents 'a moment in time' - the date the review is published Since the scores, weights and ratings contain elements of opinio

0回复 2010-06-09 13:31:50发表

64%意味着什么？Dpreview给出了详细说明：0-40% Totally unacceptable. Run away// 41-50% Poor to Below average, avoid// 51- 60% At best average, treat with caution// 61-70% Average to Good// 71-80% Very Good to Excellent// Anything over 80%: Outstanding

0回复 2010-06-09 13:28:19发表

Magnified live view resets to center position after each shot (problematic for portraits) A lot of the 'Shoot tips' only teach you how to use iAuto mode Cheapest bundle (which only provides the 16mm lens) is not a good combination, particularly for beginners

0回复 2010-06-09 13:26:06发表

'Bkground Defocus' feature encourages the use of wrong settings JPEG sharpening doesn't make the most of the camera's capabilities Very limited video control (no aperture control or exposure lock) Screw-on flash awkward to attach Screen very difficult to see in anythign more than moderately bright light Auto HDR mode only available in PASM modes Live histogram unavailable when making exposure changes Magnified live view resets to center position after each shot (problematic for

0回复 2010-06-09 13:25:43发表

High resolution sensor with excellent low-light performance (in PASM modes) Good JPEG output quality Great build quality (particularly NEX-5) Metal barrelled lenses feel impressive compared to peers Tiltable high-resolution screen Point-and-shoot interface that provides optional control of aperture Interesting extra features such as in-camera HDR and sweep panorama Good, clear live view magnification High quality video mode Built-in user guide (Shooting Tips) Conclusion - C

0回复 2010-06-09 13:20:19发表

很显然，NEX拥有索尼有史以来APS-C的最好画质，然而，Dpreview在最后的图表中明确表明了 nex的优势与劣势，以及与多家相机对比后的结果。更何况，我并没有说NEX画质不好。 但是事物总是多方面的综合体，Dpreview之所以权威，就在于它的量化测试客观、准确和全面。在最后的总结一章，Dpreview明确阐明了观点： Conclusion - Pros Small, innovative designs that are still comfortable to hold Hig

0回复 2010-06-09 13:19:26发表

However, both cameras are so prone to overexposure in an attempt to produce bright photos that there's little practical advantage to the greater dynamic range (and you can't apply exposure compensation in iAuto mode, so you can't prevent the overexposure). 对图像的质量,还是比较满意的. 至于64%是什么...自己去看看吧...

0回复 2010-06-09 12:21:58发表

老兄,这是Dpreview测试的内容:Image Quality The NEX's image quality is consistent with previous Sonys - generally rather good though not as good as the raw sensor data shows it could be. The JPEGs are bright, detailed and colorful, if a little bit over-enthusiastic when it comes to the color red (again, nothing new for Sonys). The cameras' JPEG engine manages to capture and can include a good amount of highlight information.

0回复 2010-06-09 12:21:46发表

老兄,这是Dpreview测试的内容:Image Quality The NEX's image quality is consistent with previous Sonys - generally rather good though not as good as the raw sensor data shows it could be. The JPEGs are bright, detailed and colorful, if a little bit over-enthusiastic when it comes to the color red (again, nothing new for Sonys). The cameras' JPEG engine manages to capture and can include a good amount of highlight information. However, both cameras are so prone to overexposure in an atte

0回复 2010-06-09 12:19:12发表

Dpreview测试已经出来了，NEX3/5仅获 “64%无推荐” 评价，连三星都不如，当然低光照度得分还是很高的，只是综合来讲就差了。

0回复 2010-06-08 17:28:43发表

还有,这篇文章的样照估计有点问题,sony镜头肉,但是也不可能肉成这样,估计用户根本没有对焦成功.. 另外,某网已经有客观评测,以影像质感来看，是相当扎实的.

0回复2010-06-08 16:37:40发表

是的,不难看出sony有某种缺陷,但是相信会在下一代改善和升级,至于第一代机,已经有很好的性价比和可用性了..另外,希望很出更多好的镜头,,.

0回复 2010-06-08 15:35:30发表

说SONY好的真是争眼说瞎话,SONY简直一点细节都没有，光是个平没燥点但也没细节，EPL1在400-800ISO都可用啊，够了,谁一天到晚用3200。看综合性能吧

0回复 2010-06-07 18:23:28发表

要评测就要认真的把文章写好，让大家有个客观的对比，看了这篇文章不知所云！

0回复 2010-06-07 17:27:28发表

索尼NEX5有严重瑕疵，镜头成像有问题，迄今为止索尼发布的所有官方样片都浑浊、模糊不清，解析度太差，目前潜在客户都对索尼NEX5有很高的期望，草率上市只能伤害客户，损人不利己，请大家查看索尼NEX5的官方样片，包括此栏，看我说的是否有道理。

0回复 2010-06-07 16:26:24发表